Sign Up | Log in |

Hillary Clinton MBTI

Myers Briggs type and personality details of 'Hillary Clinton'
Hillary Clinton MBTI type
Realm:


Category:
Politicans and Leaders

TOTAL MBTI VOTES: 69


ESTJ - 52
INTJ - 13
ENTJ - 4

[Famous ESTJs]

Log in to vote!

TOTAL ENNEA VOTES: 41


1W2 - 16
3W4 - 12
3W2 - 10
5W6 - 3

[Famous Enneagram 1]

Log in to vote!

Old (unmoderated comments)

If Hillary was 3w2 that explains her coat tailing her husband Bill Clinton and continuing Obama era of progressive if that makes any sense. In other words she doesn't have a goal for herself. If she is 3w4 then she in it for herself. And that explains why she really wants to be the first female president in USA and breaks the glass sealing.

MBTI type of Hillary Clinton

. And she deserves it.she likes to make a 3-like presentation of the 2 things she's done in her life if that makes any sense.

Find out about Hillary Clinton personality type

. i can't really see her being a wing 4 -- it would contradict her 3 in a way that would be recognizable even behind her political imageshe's probably 3w2 come to think of it like her detachment isn't really the product of her potential 4 wingI could of put her 3w2 as a motivator and promoter because she is an activist. But at the same time she is always seems to be concern covering her weakness in the front of the media.Information about Myers Briggs Type Indicator of Hillary Clinton.seems more 3w4 than anythingShe's energetic but she doesn't know how to connect with or relate to people at all. She has very little feeling.Which of the 16 personality types is Hillary Clinton?. The Te dominance is obvious. Also she's not a visionary, her views adapt with the times. There's also this zanyness to her that ESxJs tend to have. So I think ESTJ.in that video i can't really say much more than xxtj like there isn't anything particularly intuiting or sensing there and nor do i really get much of introversion or extraversion out of iti think she's most definitely te leading -- at least in front of an audience -- and probably why her intuition becomes obscured, but i don't think her being te dominant necessarily means that she's extraverted. but her most used functions imo might be te, ni and si, probably with some fe and possibly a little bit of ne too. by the letters i think she's i, n, t and j with t and j obviously being the strongest. i can't give a great argument for sensing vs intuition because i see her more as non-se and non-ne; i would guess ni and si are both pretty high in her. my argument for that dichotomy is honestly just gonna be she's not very sensing compared to being somewhat intuiting. but her using what can be interpreted as te more in our public eye is what makes it hard to see either in her. i just don't believe she's a sensor. like just her upbringing and academic background and political involvement all makes me think she's more likely than not someone who is more in tune with intuition than sensing.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7oy_DqKqTg0 Sounds like a frustrated ESTJ to me. I do see her reasoning Ne and Si trying to connect Russia and 1000 agents to what I have no idea is she talking about. lol at covering pearl harbor being cover up. Okay I get the main message. She is saying she is innocent and was hard working and everyone else were being shady and blindside her, including the DNC. But then CNN wants a reconfirmation that she really mean to blames DNC. She backed out to defend herself to tell the other instinctively backed off by doing the stop hand sign at 2:06. To put it simple: Hillary, "I am not saying its your fault that I lost, but it is your fault that I lost." But yeah feel free to disagree.Not to barge in the middle of the conversation since I don't know a whole lot about Hillary, but @strawberry crisis, since you're proposing she's INTJ, here's a link describing her as such with regards to body language, just Ctrl+F her name: (http://cognitivetype.com/2016/02/17/nite-vedain-book-import/). I can only guarantee the validity of this as far as I fit the description they gave very well myself.I also am willingly to admit that I type people with a broad stroke. To me it looks accurate overall, but when delve deeper and look into more minor details, there is a lot of inaccuracies. But that is because I don't see the point of it. So yeah I am willingly to accept criticism of my typing. But anyway let's not derailed the thread. Can you give me a basic reason why you think Hillary is an INTJ 5w6? I can see you are saying she does plan things ahead, but in what approach? Te or Ti? I see her approach of planning Te. And her performance of projecting is not being able to deliver a convincing manner. Do you consider that's her Te overriding/resisting Fi? Like she probably felt deep inside what is the point of me projecting myself across the media? Or what do you think?I am glad you asked. Anyway when I try to typed someone. I first try to get an overall image of the person by observing which function appears more frequently, and which one is most likely fit that cognitive approach. I then go other website sources and rechecked them with mine to get a more accurate type. If I am off, then I rechecked my typing. I repeat going back and forth to get an accurate type of the person. I don't really delve to deep of other people, or other potential possibilities, once I get a basic understanding of their type. I might be off 1 or 2 enneagram, because that is more of my blindspot of not taking too much considering, and only focusing things the major appropriate stacking. And you might be right she might be a possible introversion, that I didn't pick up, because as I stated I only went the most recent of her in 2016+. I can even go further that say she is Fi inferior because she constantly gets caught lying, i.e: about her being sniper rifle shot. Or I cop-out she just have very poor memory, but that wouldn't do no good for getting a good typing of her. Regardless of inferior Fi.the problem with your argument is that you apply your functions anywhere in this sorta arbitrary manner -- what says something is leading, auxiliary, tertiary, or inferior and why do certain (not necessarily even consistent) mannerisms get tied to the functions that way? hillary doesn't really strike me as exxj in the sense that she doesn't have a hold on her external environment in the way extraverted judgers tend to have. but her judging is obvious in a way you can call it self-dictating: she plans ahead, she memorizes, she rehearses, and she tries to get her words down perfectly -- but never in a convincing manner. her body language and practically theatrical reservedness reveals her cerebrality and, in my opinion, her introversion. i don't see hillary as someone who gets energized by being around people but more as someone who deals with it in order to accomplish her goals. she's definitely very 3 in that regard: a determined go-getter and opportunist. honestly i might consider it over 3, since her introversion explains her 5 side. as for intuition and sensing, i lean intuition mainly because she just seems to be more in tune with ideas than facts themselves. her style seems kind of fact oriented, but she doesn't really speak with just facts in mind -- she talks about a "vision" she sees, and she doesn't refute her opponent by picking apart their argument with facts just as they are (as i would imagine a sensor to!) but has an idea-centric way of explaining her opposition's arguments. she also has funny "how could you not see it this way?" undertones that vaguely point to introverted intuition, where she seems to have ideas that she doesn't really explain so well. i feel like they're there, but they don't get translated in her words. it's just an intuition vibe i guessI made a minor mistake: She is 8w9 compare to Trump who is more of 8w7.* Of course in their own tritype respective.Extravert doesn't mean you are loud or boisterous.* I still believe Hillary is a tritype 368. As Donald Trump stated in the debate that she is fighter. She been campaign and political activist for her entire life. Although I am pretty sure he was being tongue in cheek, that Hillary is a sore-loser, and doesn't want to lose. Anyway 3rd times the charm in 2020? Am I right?To be honest I just focus the 2016 election only. Also extravert means you are loud and boisterous. Te-dom, because everything she said in the entire campaign was just "Me, Me, and I did this and did that." Everything has to go back to her. Most of her campaign was her donor, news reporter, and famous hollywood actor. Everyone was telling Hillary was great. Si auxiliary because she used her past experience and thought she could win running the 1990 or that she is entitle it. Tertiary Ne even supports the fact she thinks shes a female therefore she is entitle to become a president and breaking the glass seal. She even tries to be a cool grandma, which comes out being cringy at best. Hillary was found jogging and posted a picture by someone, that if I recalled was one of her staff. I remember that Pokemon Go statement thing she did to appear hip and popular. Inferior Fi is there, because she didn't bother visits the rust belt, and thought she had everything in the bag. The fact she didn't appear during the concession speech and tells Podesta, instead is very weak Fi. Now without that my other option would of been ISTJ, but I don't think Hillary is weak on the Ne. And if she was an ISTJ or INTJ, then that makes her defeat even more tragic or in my opinion comical. As for 3w4 leading. My verdict is based on the fact that she was trying succeed and life and try to be a role model to young women. But at times I think she is very detach about it. I even consider 5w6, but after watching the "Why I am not 50 points ahead?" That to me clicked 6w5. She had always been on the defensive. 6w5 is a counter phobic just like 5w6, but 6w5 will react more then 5w6 and be on the defensive. Not only that I think Hillary is more of a sensor, and most sensor/thinking orientated tends to be 6 or specifically 6w5. She is 8w7 compare to Trump who is more of 8w9. She doesn't show it but, it has reported or rumor she throw and tantrum after losing the election or that she drink/drunk herself to get away from the feeling defeat and despair. And to make matter worse she blames Comey of her defeat and recently stated that DNC didn't help her enough during the campaign that she blew 1.2 billion dollars and still lost.where do y'all get extraversion from? i could maybe accept sensing, but there is no way she's extraverted being so secretive, private, and almost "unnatural" in front of an audience. she's very headish to the point where she gets disconnected with her achievement and academic leanings, and she presents that side of herself very poorly i think, but it seeps through her "estj" facade on stage when she's in a sticky situation during a debate. she lacks trump's whole schtick with manipulating and controlling her environment, instead relying on her previous knowledge to answer questions. somehow she doesn't know how to present herself well, which i feel as though is uncharacteristic of a 3. i think now she could be 3 leading when you look at her as a politician but she may just be playing pretend and could be 5 or 1 first with a 3-fix maybe. i'm not really sure. i'll refrain from voting there, but she's almost definitely a 351 or a 531, and definitely 5w6 if it's that first. she reeeeeally doesn't seem like she could be either a 2 or a 4 wing honestly but 5 with a 6 wing makes sense.ESTJ tritype 368. Leading enneagram 3w4 so/sp. 6w5 and 8w9 are the others.My friend has a friend in the military and he apparently met Obama. He said Obama was nice but Hillary and Michelle were both super bitchy.I was struggling to figure out her enneagram. She's not ethical like a 1, not image-conscious like a 3 (she can be really "out of touch"), and doesn't seem to be careful like a 6 or aggressive like an 8. She is instead a 5w6. Above all, she takes a more studious "think-tankish" technocratic approach to politics even when it distances herself from the public. She's an academic at heart who over years in the public eye programmed her robotic self to be somewhat presentable as a politician, but she excessively relies on knowledge rather than charisma or manipulation (she leaves that to other people to do on her behalf). I'm unsure if ENTJ or INTJ works better, but she's not a senser either (for basically the same reasons). In Jung's conception, she's definitely an extraverted thinking type but that isn't MBTI.I was struggling to figure out her enneagram. She's not ethical like a 1, not image-conscious like a 3 (she can be really "out of touch"), and doesn't seem to be careful like a 6 or aggressive like an 8. She is instead a 5w6. Above all, she takes a more studious "think-tankish" technocratic approach to politics even when it distances herself from the public. She's an academic at heart who over years in the public eye programmed her robotic self to be somewhat presentable as a politician, but she excessively relies on knowledge rather than charisma or manipulation (she leaves that to other people to do on her behalf). I'm unsure if ENTJ or INTJ works better, but she's not a senser either (for basically the same reasons). In Jung's conception, she's definitely an extraverted thinking type but that isn't MBTI.I was struggling to figure out her enneagram. She's not ethical like a 1, not image-conscious like a 3 (she can be really "out of touch"), and doesn't seem to be careful like a 6 or aggressive like an 8. She is instead a 5w6. Above all, she takes a more studious "think-tankish" technocratic approach to politics even when it distances herself from the public. She's an academic at heart who over years in the public eye programmed her robotic self to be somewhat presentable as a politician, but she excessively relies on knowledge rather than charisma or manipulation (she leaves that to other people to do on her behalf). I'm unsure if ENTJ or INTJ works better, but she's not a senser either (for basically the same reasons). In Jung's conception, she's definitely an extraverted thinking type but that isn't MBTI.Biggest failure in the history of modern politics. Her behavior on election night was extremely ESTJ in the saddest way possible. (Seriously, look it up. There's a reason she didn't give her concession speech until the next day.)INTJ http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-melcher/hillary-clinton-misunders_b_76282.htmlI've heard she throws tantrumsXXXX. She'll be whatever type she has to to get elected.Ye, my favorite!! Heil Hitlary!!!Oh would you look at that? A Nazi endorsing his favorite candidate.Having a vagina is the best credential.Hillary is more hawkish than Trump. Apart from a few social issues she's a total disasterThats quite naive of you to think that.STFU. She is 100x better than that clown.This is an obvious ESTJ trying to behave like an ESTP. Her tactic is nearly the same as Trump, but the difference is that she is a bad player.This is an obvious ESTJ trying to behave like an ESTP. Her tactic is nearly the same as Trump, but the difference is that she is a bad player.She's a 3w4 though, not 3w2. 3w2's are supposed to be more people oriented (sort of like MBTI Fe-doms), 3w4's are more serious, task-oriented. She's the latter.Such a blatant ESTJ it hard to miss.ENTJ can be like that too though. At some point in her life she was a lot more ideological but I think her Te just is a lot stronger than her Ni.Definitely ESTJ. No question there. Every ESTJ I can think of tends to be power-hungry or hungry for control.I'm going for ESTJ. She talks about in one of her quotes advancing the common humanity, doing what's best for society, but it doesn't stop there. This may seem ESFJ, but in her other quotes she talks about her beliefs and doesn't mention how society fits in with that. It seems to me that she is primarily concerned with advancing society with her own beliefs Te-Fi. She also mentions having a positive outlook on the future, which leads me to believe that she is not intuition inferior, as intuition inferior would be more fearful of the unknown. I also notice her saying she loves live audiences with real people, which is a definite sign of extraversion. I don't see any Ni in her because her quotes are mostly focused on hard work and the common good rather than vision and foresight.Te makes her action oriented but her Si makes her reluctant to challenge status quo and keeping things the way they are working. But on the other hand she is actually very realistic in her approach.I have no concrete proofs but I always saw her as a I... even if she speaks quite well in public it seems very prepared ... she is not a natural public speaker. She is clearly Te... ISTJ or INTJ for me.She's clearly ESTJ, indeed.I agree with gary, though I see ENTJ at a level too. For the sake of discussion, anyone got an argument for N? And @Debaser, why do you see her as an introvert?Intelligent, practical minded, result oriented and very grounded. An ESTJ.yes of course, Hillary C and Nixon HAVE THE SAME TYPE and they are both I. Haha, that debaser is a joke.Could be so but I was asking that question to isolate the debate of S vs NShe's not an E either. Clear cut INTJ.I'd be curious for the arguments for ESTJ over ENTJ, cause I'm not seeing any.