Sign Up | Log in |

Luna Lovegood MBTI

Myers Briggs type and personality details of 'Luna Lovegood'
Luna Lovegood MBTI type

Literature (Book), Movie and TV Show Characters

Part of:
Harry Potter

[Harry Potter MBTI list]


INFP - 109
INTP - 100
INFJ - 3
ISFP - 2
ENTP - 1
ENFP - 1

[Famous INFPs]

Log in to vote!


9W1 - 42
5W4 - 31
4W5 - 14
9W8 - 6
7W6 - 1

[Famous Enneagram 9]

Log in to vote!

Old (unmoderated comments)

. Why, she is such a NINE. . She seems to be more worried about her inner peace and comfort than knowledge, she is very positive outlook and lighthearted, she also talks more like a 9 (head-in-the-clouds, daydreaming, random).

MBTI type of Luna Lovegood

. She "merges" very easily with people, as if she is comfortable around everyone even though no one is comfortable around her, as if she is always idealizing her surroundings ("people are just having fun while they steal my stuff, no big deal, they give back" vibes). Even in real life It's hard to catch Fi or Ti when somebody isn't a walking stereotype.

Find out about Luna Lovegood personality type

. I'm in art school and hate math/computer science so people would say I'm an INFP but I'm so essence/accuracy/objectivity matters more in my head. :-(Hey guess what.Information about Myers Briggs Type Indicator of Luna Lovegood. Contrary to popular belief, INTPs aren't just colder version of INFPs. The 5w4 INTPs are especially good at feeling almost childlike in its purity affection towards friends.Which of the 16 personality types is Luna Lovegood?. Luna is a sensitive INTP, not an INFP. Contrary to popular belief, INFPs aren't just the dumber version of INTPs. Though we may have a feeling preference over thinking, that has nothing to do with our intelligence or intellectual capabilities. Luna is an intelligent INFP, not an INTP. @Klkatykat I agree One thing I recognized is, in the books Luna is a lot more defensive about her beliefs. In the books she gets angry when people say her theories are wrong. She stubbornly defends them and does this in a very emotional manner. When 4s get unhealthy, they indulge in their emotions and want to feel everything even more intensely. The five cuts themselves off from others, feels separate. @Klkatykat Preach. Best explanation about the importance of Feeling and Thinking ever. ) aaaaI'd say INTP, but I can see INFP too. Whoever who voted ESTP was on drugs, lol. Obviously there is a trace of it on the outside but an fi-dom would hardly be that confident about their personality and actions or so fast to notice stuff that didn't have so much to do with their identity. Luna seems to be moved by curiosity (Ne) and while she may get hurt by what others do or say, it's never to do with her self-image. INTP (9w4. )*Whoops, I meant: Peaceful, "ROMANTIC" contemplative (5-9-4)5-9-4 Tritype- which is the peaceful, reflective "Contemplative". But why. I'm an INTP and Luna is basically my spirit animal :p@Alkeris: Her father is an ENFP, and the curiosity is a result of Ne, which is equally prevalent in both INxP types. She quite look like an INFP from the outside but the reason she do 'weird thing' is by mostly by curiosity (more an INTP hobbies). You can compare her to her father who is A real INFP. . . . . . . . . hahahaha. . . . . . . An Fe-dom Luna would recognize and act on others' feelings, follow others' values, and take the world and aim to please it. It's quite clear that Fi > Fe. . It describes what a person wants to become (and are to a sense. The type can't change and it is their natural inclination to be like this so it is a piece of who they are) Often a person's enneagram type corresponds quite a bit to their myers briggs type (which describes their naturally preferred way of functioning) the relationship between their myers briggs and enneagram types also seems to conflict in some situations. They want to be aware of their emotions and deal with them personally. Most type 4s are attracted to the idea of being an infp on the mbti. ) The infp enneagram 4 pairing barely conflicts at all. An enneagram 4 infj however has Fe and while they are still emotional like an infp and still have that poetic aura to them they don't have it quite the way an infp would and may wonder why their feelings are directed this way and may even try to mimic Fi. They may want to be introverted like their enneagram 4 self image. An esfp 2 is attracted to the idea of being an Enfj. They are intuitive and have dom Fe. They're fully based on helping everyone around them. Of all the mbti types, intp seems to embody enneagram 5. Intp 5s are like Einstein. The things luna says indicate Fi. An infp 5 would try to be emotionally detached and logical but their logic would stray to the emotional side. . . . I'm a bit suspicious of the fact that Luna has 83 votes and Harry Potter only has 55. And I must say, though I generally stay away from Enneagram typing, wouldn't it make far more sense for an INFP 5 to act like Luna than for an INTP 5. The thing is, though, even given the existence of magic in the Harry Potter world, Luna still isn't logical and yet is highly emotionally sincere. Where does she exhibit Ti over Fi. Remember Ti isn't just "subjective logic"; it takes impersonal premises and principles and subjects them to logical analysis, often in a deductive and analytical manner. Not like Luna. . . i. e. I too see her as INTP. My observations are only based on the movies - never read the books - so it might be a bit off because of that. . I don't really see Fi in her (I'm INFP), Ti makes more sense in my opinion. She reminds me of an INTP friend too but I'm not basing my judgement on that (it might make me a bit biased though ^^). I see good arguments for both sides, not entirely convinced. . . Great points. Especially since 75% of the comments are pro-INFP. . . . She came up with a possible explanation for voldemort's actions. This wasn't plotting against him but could even be considered sympathizing. An infp could do this. Actually when you really dissect the quote it seems totally fi-ne. . . Its possibility based. Night, lets be clear. The Myers Briggs is a system of explaining how they process and interact with the world. Feeling and thinking are oxygen and carbon dioxide (they need eachother to work properly) Emotions are related to opinions. Without thought you have no ability to sort your emotions. With only feeling you are a jellyfish, purely instinctual with only a need to feed, rest, and reproduce. Each type could be a dictator. Infps are notorious for sticking to their firmly held values. Same with isfps. I know an isfp who everyone thinks is just pure and nice but when angered she's a fire breathing dragon. Te from absolute fact and ti from self constructed logic. Fe would know how to manipulate and fi would be aware of an intense rage driving them to conquer. Grant (ISFP), then. He was a great general and yet was a Fi dom. She just speculated on Voldemort's strategy using her own self as an example. That's extremely Fi. INFP's are not capable of developing a strategy that would destroy a person. Also INFPs have Te, it's just inferior. INFP's do not have Ti/Te so therefore they cannot be strategic and come up with moves to defeat people. On your arguement that feeling types are more socially adept than their logical counterparts: This would be true in xxFJ types (Fe) but Fi is used mainly to address ones own feelings. I'm xNFx but know of ExTPs that are more socially adept than I am. (Though not emotionally) xxTPs have Fe and know how to smooth out situations better than an xxFP would. (They're so inside themselves emotionally and don't display an excess of of outer warmth) They can seem just as cold as intps in alot of cases. Whoops (I thought it said ". . . . . Great points Ventus. Also yes, I would agree that the quote resembles Fi. IXFPs can isolate themselves. Whether or not the quote seems Fi to you, it can't possibly be argued as Ti or Fe. And she doesn't care people call her Loony simply because she's happy with who she is. Both INTPs and INFPs can have high self-esteem despite being considered eccentric by others. That quote is actually reminiscent of Fi as it puts her own self in Voldemort's shoes ("if I were You-Know-Who") and extrapolates off of that what Voldemort would want Harry to feel ("I'd want you to feel cut off from everyone else"). The entire strategic basis of the quote is emotion-based and very indicative of Fi. A strategic move to defeat Harry Potter. Yeah she knows that they call her Looney but she could care less. Well if I were You-Know-Who, I'd want you to feel cut off from everyone else. Because if it's just you alone you're not as much of a threat. It was like having friends. " "You're being rather rude you know. Some people call me ‘Loony’ Lovegood, actually. ” “He says very funny things sometimes, doesn’t he. ” “Oh, it’s been all right. A bit lonely without the DA. She stopped two boys in our Transfiguration class calling me ‘Loony’ the other day" “There,” she said softly, “Now he could be sleeping. ” (remember when she closed dobby's eyes after he died. ). } These quotes (and to a lesser extent the ones I omitted) suggest social awareness and a preference for feeling over thinking. But F does mean that you are atleast socially aware. *little to do with being socially adept a prioriRead through the thread again and you indeed gave some other reasons; I apologize for misconstruing your argument. You haven't addressed any of the new pro-INFP arguments other than by throwing in a video and calling them ridiculous. As for typing fictional characters, yes you often have to go off of behavior, but no you don't have to by default. Also by-the-letters Luna is a definite INFP still: highly value-based and emotionally sincere, but not logical. F means you're guided by values and emotions more so than by logic. I used other points to back up my belief that she is an INTP. . Also Obama is a Ti subtype ENTP. You have to understand that for fictional characters you have to type them based on behavior. . In the movie Mark is an INTP and that is completely out of character for an INTP. R. R. Tolkien. And if you're convinced by anecdotal evidence, which I gather you are, I know several female INFPs and INTPs. And the INFPs much more closely resemble Luna in every way. That's not a good argument. I'll give you a different example that uses your exact logic: "I'm an INTJ. On another occasion someone said I reminded him of Obama (INTP). And on yet another occasion someone said I reminded him of Sam Harris (INFJ). " See what I mean. People can resemble other types all the time. Luna may or may not resemble INTPs (in my opinion, most of the time, not) but you have to prove she is an INTP using actual theory (prove Ti-Fe and/or T > F). You haven't done that. I'll grant you that quotes alone don't determine type. But neither does anecdotal evidence or one possible INTP who acts like Luna. Ok well. . . she has antisocial traits that is rare amongst INTP's. Also I think Jack actually could be an INTP . . Jack is an intp. I asked if you thought April was istp or intp. I've actually watched the video and that girl isn't intp. Just because she claims intp doesn't mean she is one. Also why do you keep saying "intp girls". People of a personality type generally act similar regardless of their gender. Even intp 4s are logical. April Ludgate is an obvious ISTP. This whole ridiculous argument that she doesn't say analytical things is dumb. All her quotes have been observations or moderately warm. https://www. youtube. com/watch. Eric Foreman (That 70's Show) Bryan Griffin (Family Guy) L Lawliet (Death Note) (A perfect example of a logical eccentric) I'm sorry that I can't think of any other fictional intps off the top of my head but a great example of a real figure would be Albert Einstein (Again a logical eccentric)Well of course she's nothing like harry. Se and ne are VERY different. Or if you want to compare her to other IFPs from the series like Harry Potter, also compare her to ITPs from the series like Mad-Eye Moody. I think it's rather apparent that she's much closer to Harry than Moody. Nothing she says is analytical or logical. True she's not exactly like Harry (ISFP) but instead of only comparing her to other IFPs, compare her to INTPs too. " When INTPs say random quirky things, if you analyze what they say it's actually very logical, just unusual. I challenge you to analyze any of Luna's quotes logically. So you guys would say she is an idealist like an actual INFP like Harry Potter. Most of her quotes have been just observations by the way. They're kinda like Luna but much more analytical and much less emotionally aware. But I didn't use that as part of my argument because that's anecdotal evidence. . . (And also, letter-by-letter, I still type her INFP as she's not at all analytical or logic-based but is very value-driven and emotional). (2) How does that preclude INFP. I said she's not at all analytical but is extremely emotionally sincere and warm inside. Read my post again and Klkatykat's quotes and the other pro-INFP arguments. Have you people even met a female INTP. Who says INTP's are not inclined to say moderately warm things. 1. You are usually forced to type them by their behavior 2. She is socially inept and blissfully unaware. 3. I agree with Klkatykat. Here's why Luna despite her subjective logic is not a Ti type: Ti is a function that is largely deductive and analytical in that it takes impersonal premises and principles and subjects them to logical analysis. No; just as Te dominants are extremely logical in that they take the facts and systemize them into externally verifiable frameworks, so too are Ti dominants extremely logical in that they theorize and subject those theories and premises to factual analysis to make sure they are logically consistent. Does Luna do that. No. They're not logically sound OR unsound because they're not even logical principles: they're personal, EMOTIONAL principles, a. k. a. That's her entire character: she says quirky and eccentric yet inwardly warm and wise little nuggets of emotional sincerity that endear people to her despite her eccentricity. She's not analytical or deductive at all. Luna is extremely different from that. If anything her T function is inferior in that she seems to be unaware of the facts at times and never analyzes anything. HAVE YOU MET AN INTP BEFORE. ALMOST EVERYTHING LUNA SAYS IS EMOTIONAL. And inner warmth. Well here are some luna lovegood quotes: "I enjoyed the meetings too. " "Don't worry. You're just as sane as I am. But I've still got Dad. And anyway, it's not as though I'll never see Mum again, is it. " (Offended) “I think they think I’m a bit odd, you know. Some people call me ‘Loony’ Lovegood, actually. But he can be a bit unkind, I noticed that last year. ” “Oh, it’s been all right. Ginny’s been nice, though. She stopped two boys in our Transfiguration class calling me ‘Loony’ the other day-“ ". . . . . ” (remember when she closed dobby's eyes after he died. Inner warmth. " INTPS AREN'T LIKE THIS AT ALL. Intps aren't "loony". Look at the quotes. Everything she says is emotional. About a month ago I had mixed feelings about her but I'm more and more convinced she's an INTP. Being the eccentric, dreamy, "Alice Adventures" lookalike girl gives her an INFP vibe, but function-wise Ti makes so much more sense. It becomes very obvious when you compare her to Fi dominants like Harry that she isn't one. SHe isn't illogical, she uses a subjective yet impersonal logic; this is exactly why she looks eccentric/loony. . Its her weakest function so obviously she will have a lack of understanding of the social realm making her appear kinda blissfully unaware of her actions. . . " [I Would actually argue intj appears the emptiest. Alot of Intps don't appear very empty really, especially once they better develop Fe] Also INFPs are very aware of the social implications of their actions while INTP's are not at all socially attuned. From what i've noticed, intps are aware of this but alot are socially awkward but others are great socially] "She says things that causes awkward moments . . She is an INTP" [Actually alot of infps/enfps are like this (more enfps) they know and they're actually proud of it because they believe in expressing themselves. They don't want to be normal. It seems random. The things she says are deep and emotional and weird not logical. Well here are some luna lovegood quotes: "I enjoyed the meetings too. It was like having friends. You're just as sane as I am. "  "I still feel very sad about it sometimes. And anyway, it's not as though I'll never see Mum again, is it. " "You're being rather rude you know. Some people call me ‘Loony’ Lovegood, actually. ” “He says very funny things sometimes, doesn’t he. ” “Oh, it’s been all right. A bit lonely without the DA. She stopped two boys in our Transfiguration class calling me ‘Loony’ the other day-“ ". . . . . ” (remember when she closed dobby's eyes after he died. Inner warmth. "If she had Fe she would try to act normal. And intps don't have that dreamy idealistic aura. She's dom fi. I'm sorry. Obviously. I don't even know why there is even a question about this. . . She's the posterchild for infp. INTP's are not empty inside but out of the 16 types INTP's appear the emptiest. She says things that causes awkward moments . . She is an INTPObvious infp. No doubt about it. . . . Get it. Not empty inside and neither is she. In the movies she always appear to be in her own fantasy world and is not a cold analyst. Alright . . She appears empty inside while saying random shit. INTPINFP 5w4 explains it the best I think. I'm still open to INTP but not very. In either case, fictional characters are usually pretty tricky. INFP with some resemblence with INTP. I believe both Ti and Fi are fiercely independent. INTPs on the other hand seek independence of mind and seek universal truths and principles usually devoid of any values/beliefs to back them up, however unlike INFPs they don't seek to be different and are actually quite awkwardly different due to inferior Fe. I believe Luna is quite happy with who she is. I believe both Ti and Fi are fiercely independent. But Fi is more about accepting once's individuality and uniqueness, Fi combined with Ne gives INFP the idiocyncracy and dreamy outlook who are very comfortable with who they are. I believe Luna is quite happy with who she is. Fi and Fe are feeling functions, not feelings/emotions. I always find fictional characters hard to type because most of them are multi faceted and can fit more than one type at a time and that seems to be the case with Luna. I think in movies she seems more INFP. Whats agreed is her auxiliary Ne outlook which gives her a whimsical, dreamy outlook. In favour of Ti : -She is able to overlook negative aspects of her circumstance and rarely feel threatened but rather show detachment even in situations implying danger for her and her friends. -Her logic is precise, absolute, detached, subjective and very stubborn. -She is all about how she understands the world, how she observes it, challenging established beliefs; not about her journey or who she is - She rarely gets offended and never takes things personally. "She doesn't care" is actually a good way to sum her up, which sounds very Ti dom to me. -She is also very detached from her emotions. When she talks with Harry he is the one feeling uncomfortable because Fi can't be that detached about personal and fundamentally "human" themes like these. -She has that typical repressed Fe that makes her quite unaware of people's rituals but at the same time secretly wishing to fit in. There is definitely a gap between her and Harry who is Fi dominant. Harry has no Ne but compare him to INFPs like Frodo for example and the Fi dom similarities are pretty obvious nonetheless. Also compare how she clashes with Hermione's Te and how Harry clashes with Hermione's Te. Pretty different, Ti vs Te / Fi vs Te. Harry will aggressively and directly clash while Luna will detach with her "I don't care" attitude. I think Luna and Hermione are good examples of the logic of Ti-Ne vs Te-Si. Also she fits the stereotype of the hippy, quiet, dreamy, eccentric girl, so many INFPs will relate. I wonder if she were a boy if it would affect how people see her. . agree to degree . WOW. The arguments in favour of INTP are so strong and convincing and totally reliant on Jungian theory that I can't even take part with my limited knowledge. She is an ESFJ, ESFJs can be dreamers too, I know ESFJs who are just like her, therefore I conclusively determine she is an ESFJ, so now I'll spam ESFJ votes. Sounds convincing right. The girl in this video is an INTP and you can clearly see that they resemble in personality https://www. youtube. com/watch. ). INFPs are above all else sincere and individualist, both of which fit Luna perfectly. Both INFPs and INTPs can be innocent. As for the "if you ever met an INTP girl you would know," that's anecdotal evidence and shouldn't really be used as part of your argument. " But anyway again I see no Ti and a bucketload of Fi. Don't be fooled by her lack of outward warmth; she is not at all an analytical thinker but is indeed a sincere dreamer. She is in her own little world. . com/guess-type/164727-luna-lovegood-intp-infp. html Not 100% convinced she is INTP (nor INFP either) but there are a lot of good points there. Some one please help me understand the INTP votes. She is so INFP it hurts. She's not a five. That's crazy. INFP. I also see a pattern of votes for certain celebrities in the same order with same votes which rattles my suspicion. Admin should look into it. Luna is not analytical, deductive, or dispassionate; she's individualist, unique/eccentric, and gentle/kind. To me the Fi is very evident. It certainly wouldn't explain the opposite. Honestly I can totally see why people type her INTP. I really don't know myself which type she could be. She definitely isn't an archetypal INFP. How are people typing her as intp. I keep seeing her being typed as intp and it's one of the funniest things. She's one of the most infpish characters ever created. If you don't know the mbti then don't vote on it. INFP. INFPs are detached but have alot going on inside. She is anything but analytical. INFP. Eccentric, wise, considerate, and off in her own world. Not analytical enough to be INTP.

I guess INTP > INFP. She doesn't use Te for sure. Also, I don't think she is a Fi dom at all. She is so undifferent to almost everything what happens, ever being so cold, doesn't seem to have a particular connection to anything, save for her interest in magical creatures, which is obviously a more intellectual interest than anything. and she just don't care for nothing what people say about her and even what they DO with her (like steal her shoes), something that I guess an INFP would give most importance (they can problably does not show this, but will care hardly in core). The way how she talks with people come to me most as Inferior Fe than Fi Dom. At last, I will talk about that scene when she relates and identify herself with Harry's story, an INFP would be so much more INTENSE than she went when finding someone that perfectly understand how she feels

I agree with this, she isn't really Fi actually.

Yeah im not sure why so many people see her as INFP since she has no Fi. INTP is a better choice since she uses a lot of Ti. She doesn't use feelings in a lot of situations, she uses logic instead of feelings

INFP 9w1. 9w1 (positive 2-7-9 triad, denying problems) because she's too unpretentious and optimistic to be either 4w5 (reactive 4-6-8 triad, emotional with problems) or 5w4 (competence 1-3-5 triad, objective with problems). She also seems to have no proper shame or fear, she's too distant and goes with the flow like all 9w1s do. Both 4w5 and 5w4 have sharper edges and are anxious about their role of outsiders, Luna is anything but anxious and kinda melts away all the time. It's also the one case when you can tell enneagram type from the tone of somebody's voice (from the movies at least). INFP because only INFPs care about typing her :P But also because her quirkiness is mostly fantastical not intellectual. Interest in magical creatures being an indicator of Ti? Why? Somehow the most known characters interested in those creatures are Newt Scamander and Hagrid, both also typed as Fi-doms (in real life that could be called a coincidence, in fiction it could be called author's intention to highlight ethical significance of taking care of animals or nature in general). Neither of the trio seems to care much about being (or being seen as) "intellectual". Luna has very rarely succeeded to prove/explain that things she believes in are factual. If she's an INTP, she would one of the most nonsensical INTPs to ever live. "Hermione was initially frustrated with Luna's belief in all manner of things without logical grounds or proof." xSTJ easily pointing out logical inconsistency of an INTP or a Five? Luna displays Fi in: personal beliefs (in weird creatures that no one has ever seen), personal tastes (uncool but deliberate clothing etc.) and personal sense of morality (unbreakable loyalty, peace, but most importantly classic and easily spotted Fi trait of being "herself" just because). On the other hand, she shows little need for logic of any kind or analytical breaking down stuff or detailed examination of the world around her that is needed to qualify someone as a Ti user, let alone a Ti-dom. She's not interested in what makes sense, she's interested more in what makes value to her, what's she passionate about. Of course, she tries to explain who all the creatures are and how they supposedly act, but behind this explanation there's just her whim, not any serious examination. It is Si, detail-oriented but irrational, that desperately tries to back up her galloping Ne, not really Ti that would have to lead her whole decision making process. I think if she was using mostly Ti she would be more critical of The Quibbler that was full of nonsense. That would really be logic first, before beliefs, loyalty, feelings, anything. She's also superstitious and I don't really buy Ti-doms being like that. I'm not saying she doesn't use Ti at all, there are actually moments when her introverted reasoning is really on point, but overall not strong enough for a primary function. Te inferior is visible because she generally struggles with demands of being practical, assertive and orderly, however during battles or other critical situations her determination and focus on getting things done when they need to be done is noticable (of course after those situations she comes back to being dreamy). Fe inferior is rather unlikely because "Fe seeks to identify what is moral by identifying what those around them value". It's so opposite to her behaviour. Fe is not about being peaceful individually like Nine, it's about living the lives of others which is so un-Luna. Even for IxTPs, Fe seems superficially like a pain in the ass, but actually they're unconsciously driven to end up somewhat helping humanity with their Ti logic powers by improving universal, external standards of existing. Luna doesn't possess any specific Ti logic powers that could help the world, what she possess is Fi values powers which she reveals in the most delicate ways, except one time when...: "someone made fun of her father or The Quibbler, of which he was editor, the airy, dreamy quality in her voice would vanish and be replaced by one of steel (almost as sharp as a double-edged sword), and she would immediately become very angry." which is a good argument for her being Fi/Te value/fact internally warm/externally cold axis oriented (you could also make point that it's an argument against her being 9w1, but it's humanly impossible to not get angry from time to time even for 9w1s). After graduating from Hogwarts: "She discovered and classified many species that had never been encountered before, but was never able to find the Crumple-Horned Snorkack; thus, she had to come to terms with the fact that there are some things that simply do not exist." which fits really well with inferior Te narration. When Te gets more mature later in life it's all about objective verification of previously held beliefs and getting more in touch with facts and pragmatic life. She was eventually getting more Thinking, not more Feeling. So I guess what mr. Heathcliff understands as "undifferent", "cold", "no connection", "don't care" "not intense" is not something that describes INFPs or INTPs in this case, but Nines: "Nines demonstrate the universal temptation to ignore the disturbing aspects of life and to seek some degree of peace and comfort by “numbing out.”" with possibly some schizotypal disorder tendencies that are more associated with INTPs so it could be either an argument for her being INTP or, an INFP that because of this tendencies looks more like INTP ("Inappropriate or constricted affect (the individual appears cold and aloof); Behavior or appearance that is odd, eccentric or peculiar; Poor rapport with others and a tendency to withdraw socially; Odd beliefs or magical thinking, influencing behavior and inconsistent with subcultural norms; Unusual perceptual experiences including somatosensory (bodily) or other illusions, depersonalization or derealization; Vague, circumstantial, metaphorical, over-elaborate or stereotyped thinking, manifested by odd speech or in other ways, without gross incoherence"). the funniest thing is that it's my another post that I spend too much time writing and thinking I'm right, but actually I read and watched Harry Potter quite long ago and I could be also wrong.

"Hermione was initially frustrated with Luna's belief in all manner of things without logical grounds or proof." xSTJ easily pointing out logical inconsistency of an INTP or a Five?" it just Te (need for proof) against Ne (fantasies ), you mix inconsistencies (Ti) for need for proof(Te) . Luna is to detached from her own feeling to be INFP, and she clearly show Ti against harry she understand harry's emotion whereas harry just feel and doesn't try to rationalize this feelings. i think she is a 9 instead of a 5 because far more sympathetic and tolerant with people than a 5 would be. INTP tritype (9w1 5w4 4w5)

I found your analysis very interesting (and long, haha), I can actually understand several points, but I still continue with the Ti-Fe point instead of Fi-Te, assuming that what would be "logical" in the wizarding world is a bit different. The things that Luna believes are not impossible to exist in the magical world, they just have not been proven. For Luna, it's all a matter of internal logic, whether or not it's proven. You compared her interest in magical creatures to Hagrid's (a Fi dom), but Hagrid only puts his intense passion into existing creatures (and who are barely seen by others), but his interest is far more personal than intellectual. He puts his passion when he takes care of these creatures, there is much more feeling than intellectuality in his interest. And he is not so detached of his feelings in general. Luna is not like that. Her interest in magical creatures is far more intellectual than anything. She only wants to know about discovering new and different things in the magical world (not just magical creatures) that have not been proved, but which make sense to her and can exist independently of what has been proven or explained. As I said, it seems more like an intellectual interest, to discover new things, than passionate or sentimental, she is definitely not very tied to his own emotions and tends to leave them aside. I see her inferior Fe in her social ankward, difficulties in relating to the crowds, but still being able to recognize (to some degree) what others feel. The way she talks about feelings is also not very internalized. As for example when she talks about her mother's death (it's something like "yes, my mother was blown up. I'm even sad about it sometimes, because it was quite horrible, I suppose. But I still have my father, right? So it's not too bad.") She's totally disconnected from feelings that should be so profound and meaningful to her, but she still talks about them in a totally ""non-intense"" way, even though she's talking to Harry, who is one of the people who could best understand exactly how she feels (and it is from this similarity in her stories that Harry, as a Fi dom, sympathizes so strongly with Luna: because she, most than others, understands exactly what he is feeling). But Luna still feels a need to collaborate with the general welfare of society and her colleagues, such as when she joins Dumbledore's Army, and opposes Lord Voldemort because it is the right thing to do and the better thing for everybody. She feels gratified to be part of a group, to have friends and can be usefull to them. Anyway I can understand the reasoning for the INFP votes at all. And your analysis was so good.

So when harry want to do the right thing, it's Fi. Luna does it, Fe. Harry understands her, Fi. Luna, Fe. And coming from someone who also lost a parent, her response is normal. Imagine your car getting totalled without insurance and talking to someone about it, it's just "a previous event".

Luna is not guided by doing the right thing(Fi) but more by harmony (Fe). Harry understand is motivate by doing what is right luna is motivate by understanding thing around her (Ti).

The ultimate Type 9. You feel the inner peace from miles away. She's Positive Outlook., and a mediator, and completly unaware of her anger. Even 5s have less patience for BS than her. Luna takes all the crap and acts like "they're just having fun", the Nine's vice of idealizing life and people.

Could you use quotation marks when you're quoting someone, instead of pretending that what you write is your own opinion? Elveni, 10-13-2013 08:46 PM (page 1): " She doesn't seem to have a particular connection to anything, save for her interest in magical creatures, which is obviously a more intellectual interest than anything. "

I wrote my own whole opinion, I took only that specific quote because it fits perfectly with what I think and I couldn't say better even bc I don't speak English. But OK, yes it was really wrong I recognize, sorry for that

She probably is a 9w1 but anyone who is weird or a hermit is typed as a 4w5 or a 5.

web counter

9w1 INTP sx/sp. 

They think that cause they think she is nice and cute. People only like to think of INTPs are being trollish tomboys or guys. 

I meant 9w8. She doesn't have a trace of 1 in her.

Clearly INTP. She's certainly not Fi dom.

INFJ enneagram 3. 


hoping this is a joke

INTP 9w1. Only typed as INFP because she's dreamy. Her life is completely based around her Ti view of things and her Ne fantasies. Not all INTP's are irritable, society-hating recluses, people!

No, 9w1.

I don't care what you think. She has no trace of 1 whatsoever, so how do you explain her being a 9w1? Typing daydreamy people as 9w1s is getting old. 

metallic, ignore the generic female name accounts, they're all being owned under the same douchebag

thanks for letting me know, do you know who's running them?

josephty1 (he also does the “you are loved” shit but that’s a given)