Sign Up | Log in |

The least conformist type MBTI

Myers Briggs type and personality details of 'The least conformist type'
The least conformist type MBTI type
Realm:
Reality

Category:
Psychology, Philosophy, Writing and Social Sciences

TOTAL MBTI VOTES: 81


INTP - 26
INFP - 26
INTJ - 19
ENTP - 5
ENFP - 2
INFJ - 1
ESTP - 1
ISTP - 1

[Famous INTPs]
[Famous INFPs]

Log in to vote!

TOTAL ENNEA VOTES: 53


5W4 - 22
4W5 - 15
8W9 - 6
5W6 - 4
7W8 - 2
8W7 - 2
4W3 - 1
7W6 - 1

[Famous Enneagram 5]

Log in to vote!

Old (unmoderated comments)

least conformist = anti-conformity or nonconformity? i think ixtp may be the right answer if i'm going off of function correlation. i imagine a strong fi user (ixfp) would be against the idea while a not-so-strong fi user (ixtp) wouldn't acknowledge the idea of "conformity" in the first place as something that they have to actively work against, which i feel like is actually less conforming finally since it's more socially "inconsistent" if it makes any sense instead of "sticking" to a particular way of acting that would be dictated by existing standards. i also think extraversion is inherently more conforming because reliance on social standards and other people (see neo-pi-r facets warmth and gregariousness, traits that are directly "extraverted" with big five) correlates with dependence, and jungian functions te and fe play into a similar idea by organizing the external world using "preset" standards, which both extraverted judgers and perceivers have (exfx would be high fe, extx would be high te). though i also think letter-wise perceivers would actually be less conforming in a way because there isn't direct adherence to a particular set of standards possibly dictated by laws or rules (sorta like "dutifulness" under the conscientious category in big five) where we would have a choice between an anti-rule mentality or simply an unacknowledgement of rules, which are really both applicable to "least conformist" regardless of how you want to interpret it.

MBTI type of The least conformist type

. i think there might be a very slight correlation with intuition and "least conformist" because sensing tends to stick to tangibility, something that i would imagine is more socially grounded if it were compared with something more idea-based though maybe that just relates to jungian se? i'm honestly not even sure why tangibility should even be more conforming other than just intuition looks "outside the box" and extrapolates where sensing focuses less on (different) ideas instead experiencing things just like that. i would say ixxx first, then ixxp, then inxp, then intp depending on how i want to interpret "least conformist"I already written a wall of text why I came to my conclusion.

Find out about The least conformist type personality type

. But I guess it was too much. You don't have to agree but meh.Information about Myers Briggs Type Indicator of The least conformist type. https://mbti-databank.com/index.Which of the 16 personality types is The least conformist type?.php?page=pforummessage&idsujetforum=127ISFPs doesn't seem nonconformist because their main enneagram is 9, type known for conforming. But you can easily take a look on an ISFP 4(the rap artist MIA, which some people might know for their Palestina supporting songs/usually censored/, her "aggressive" style of writing or rebelling character) or 6(this really known for their rebelling, as well, and activistic tendences) and tell me it isn't.ISFPs aren't nonconformist.I understand you, being non-conformist isn't xNxP exclusive, but I'd say they're the most likely to be(Not forgetting that IxxPs are the most likely), the fact is that Ne can be creating and detached from the environment, is not exactly value-driven but more based on the fact that unconsciously, INxPs are less conforming with things happening as they're likely to just not accept them in general because their cognition drive them out, that's as well as the same why xSxPs are usually more adaptable.Well in my experience it's Ne users, just saying.We've worked up so much here the destruction of the un-transcendental and confusing fixed model of 4-functions that now that everyone left is coming back due to its popularity on internet.No, that isn't Ne exclusiveAnyone who uses Ne will immediately look to beat the system or not conform. The answer is obviously ENTP or ENFPDr Manhattan is a perfect example of INTP´s non-conformity. Hell, he left Earth and went to Mars because he could not fit into society.INxPs aren't rebels. With them it translates more into cynicism.INFPs rebel by being weird and making weird shit.Last comment. Not using phone on this website again. I hate it delete my comment and repeats. You have your and I have mine method.For some reason my comment didn't appear. INFP/INFP rebel? Okay I'll wait until that happensFor some reason my comment didn't appear. INFP/INFP rebel? Okay I'll wait until that happensYou don't even need to bring functions into this. Introverts are more individualistic than extraverts. Everyone knows that.You're still not explaining anything at all. Ti bias how? I said Ti and Fi. Also in most scenarios Ps will rebel because their introverted judging is stronger than their extraverted judging. You put too much emphasis on inferior functions. And NTPs have Si so why aren't you applying the same logic and saying they conform?Why is there a double post of mine?No you are just bitter I came in conclusion with NT. While you are incapable to see the bigger picture of all the functions let me tell you why. NT is chosen only over because T bias over F. I would of include NF too. But it all comes back to the word conformist. Asked yourself this. Is conformist an ethical question or systematic question? I will say ethical. If I claimed NT the least conformist then I will contested it. You don't know me. All you did was making more confidence with my conclusion because you lack the evidence depth. All you have is empty rhetoric. Although your IxxP is interesting approach it falls flat. It doesn't explain the complexity of each pair functions I address. All you did was showing a strong Ti and auxiliary Perceiving with a bias of Se and that is it. Did you know that artistan are compare with conformist judgement functions based on your logic? You never address whether weak Fe or Te are conformist. Weak Fe and Te are conscience of other people view in case you didn't do your research. Weak Fe or Weak Te doesn't make you a loner.No you are just bitter I came in conclusion with NT. While you are incapable to see the bigger picture of all the functions let me tell you why. NT is chosen only over because T bias over F. I would of include NF too. But it all comes back to the word conformist. Asked yourself this. Is conformist an ethical question or systematic question? I will say ethical. If I claimed NT the least conformist then I will contested it. You don't know me. All you did was making more confidence with my conclusion because you lack the evidence depth. All you have is empty rhetoric. Although your IxxP is interesting approach it falls flat. It doesn't explain the complexity of each pair functions I address. All you did was showing a strong Ti and auxiliary Perceiving with a bias of Se and that is it. Did you know that artistan are compare with conformist judgement functions based on your logic? You never address whether weak Fe or Te are conformist. Weak Fe and Te are conscience of other people view in case you didn't do your research. Weak Fe or Weak Te doesn't make you a loner.So what? You're using function magic. Js prefer extraverted judging, introverted judging is less pronounced in them, they rely on it lessJust because SJ are perceiving as conformist because Si. That is not enough. Just because Te and Fe are the consider conformist judgement. Its still isn't enough. Te will always be pair with Fi. Ti will always be pair be Fe. Until you get that through your thickAlso you're a hypocrite because you think yourself to be an NT and what types do you say are the least conformist? Oh right, NTs. I wonder why you'd say that...We're talking theoretically are we not? I'm not using my type as evidence that I'm nonconformist, shit for brains >.>My Ti is logically consistent, you're all over the place. Why are they grouped as SJs but NJs aren't grouped together? There's no reason for that, it's just arbitrary. You say I'm "rationalizing" things but you can't even back up what you say. Your arguments are tantamount to "you're wrong, I'm right because I say so" You never explained HOW I'm wrong, just claimed that I amYou Ti always lacks the evidence back things up compare to us Te. No wonder being edgy and least conformist is your safe space. Sorry to intrude. But you shot first.No you are wrong. No you are in the wrong. A single function does not represent the least conformist or the most. Your Ti is just convincing yourself. You are just a parody ISTP. That's all you ever be. Nothing more nothing less. Wrong SJ are group together because of dominant and auxiliary Si. SP are group together because dominant or auxiliary. NF and NT has no dominant or auxiliary Si or Se. Si is the most suspicious perceiving functions out of the four. Comes next is either Te or Fe being the most suspicious judgement functions. Your argument depends on introvert judgement and extravert perceiving. My is a process of eliminating of judgement and perceiving pair. You are the elitist noob. Not me, who die and make you to patrol others pants. Check your pants privilege bigot.I can't stand elitist noobs like you who don't know what they're talking about. Your stupidity offends me, only someone like you would interpret that as a fault lolTe and Fe are about conformity, Si isn't. SJs are perceived as being more conformist because they're more common and they're grouped as judgers. Si is not necessarily about rules or traditions, that's a misnomer. None of what you said even says how I'm wrong and you didn't narrow it down any more than I did.For the record I know you more than you know me. I seen your comments from time to time. You have some thing against with people want to be special​. Typical bitter ISTP sour lemon knight behavior. It's almost to a point either you enjoy being that as a parody or really you are a really bitter ISTP. Still thanks for the insight. I look into auxiliary Ne or Se.First of all it's annoying for me to explain twice. Especially on an app phone. Once again at first your logic may of make sense but you forget the basic principles of cognitive function pair. Te only pairs with Fi. Fe only pairs with Ti. Ne-Si and Se-Ni. No if or buts. Conformist isn't it's a To dominant or inferior Ne and etc. It's a combination of all the above. Asked yourself​ this question. Of all the cognitive pair from dominant to inferior. Which function pair is under of suspicion of being the most likely conformist? You should at least suspect Si Fe or Si Te. Your explanation doesn't really narrow it down. You just say Ti and Fi are subjective combining with Ne or Se auxiliary. That doesn't tell much.Everybody complies with standards rules or laws to some extent you retard >.>Fe and Te conform to a conventional way of thinking and acting, in accordance with rules. Ti and Fi are the exact opposite, they go their own way and are more individualistic in their thinking. Se and Ne don't give a fuck about rules because it holds them back from experiencing. They want to experience and explore without any limitations put on them. That's why it's oriented outwards. Te and Fe are oriented outwards as well but they conform because they're judging functions, they're utilitarian. They conform to those around them. How does my reasoning imply it's only IxFPs? I said Ti too and I'm widening the gap? You picked 4 types just like I did. You probably think you're an NT when in reality you're not even an N. You're probably some retard that discovered the system 3 months agoOk tough guy. While you try to be smart you overlooked the fact that Ne or Se auxiliary falls flat rock bottom. Each function comes in pairs of an extravert and introvert function. Tell me how an extravert perceiving functions makes them a rebel? If what you say is true then INFP/ISFP is the least conformist. You said it yourself leading Ti and Fi. If anything you just widening the gap. Good job tool. Since you are not capable with Ni. I taken the liberty of eliminating or questioning the function Si-Fe or Fe-Si pair and that is how I ended up with xNTx. But of course keep feeding your inferior Fe. It's all over the place.Nope, I don't think so dick wipe. Explain how I'm wrong or shut the fuck up.You keep telling yourself that if it makes you Ti feels better.Ok, this is the dumbest reasoning I've seen in awhile guys. The answer is IxxPs all of them, they're the least collectivist, most purely individualist. They're all introverts, they lead with a subjective judging function (Ti or Fi) so they have a unique, personal way of looking at things and are more prone to having iconoclastic views. They lack Te and Fe which is a more collectivist way of thinking. And they both have auxillary extraverted perception (Se or Ne) so they don't care about rules and they do what they want. All extraverted functions conform but Se and Ne only conform by means of perception. INxPs are stranger than ISxPs sure but I don't exactly think that makes them any less conforming.The reason I also didn't choose ESFP, because Se dominant seeks attention, inferior Se probably doesn't want attention. I actually was going to include ENFP, but I was ambivalent with the auxiliary Fi. Because unlike auxiliary Fe probably wants harmony. Auxiliary Fi will push Ne/Se dominant to go along with the conformity, even if they have little to none commonality with the collectives thought. Other than that I agree your assessment.xSFP also uses neither function, however I see Se as a bit conformist in its own right. Using this we can deduct that the two intuitive dominants (repress the more conforming sensing function) who are on the Te-Fi axis would be the least conformist. INTJ and ENFP respectively.Actually by that logic, ENTJ, INTJ, and ENFP would be the least conformist seeing as though xNTJ doesn't use either function, and ENFP has very weak Si and doesn't use Fe.It's xNTx. But first of all the cognitive functions that usually associate with conformity is perceiving Si and judgement Fe. Si makes one trust the already establishment. Fe makes on harmonize their thinking. In other words the personality of the least conformity must be someone that has very weak Fe or Si; In return they have strong Ti and Ne. The culprit for these nonconformist are ENTP and INTP. Alternatively the least conformist could be personality that lacks Ne-Si and Fe-Ti. Thus leaving Ni-Se and Fi-Te. Weak Fi and Se makes them unapproachable so alternatively INTJ and ENTJ are alternatively the least conformist as in they are unapproachable by standard rules or law, because if given a chance they will bend it to their rulership. So the 4 least conformist is not surprising the 4 xNTx personality.@thephaxsi "To me the true question of non conforming has to come through the question of whose reality is least tied to the conditions laid out to them and who has differentiated themselves not the most as a causa efficiens, but whose causa finalis is most in line with their own noumena. It is the victory of the subconscious over the conscious in terms of definitions of self and definitions of action that truly allows a person to come out of conformity and live in a reality which is theirs consciously and only one type is capable of this level of liberation. INTJ by a landslide." That is true of all four Gamma types, not just INTJ. But yes, only Gammas are capable of this level of liberation. All other types are enslaved by their own minds, to some extent.* INTJ 5w4 Sx/Sp. Hey? Who was that non conformist philosopher of that type? Oh, right. Nietszche.INFPs can take their own expression of personal identities or beliefs they have which have been regarded as "other" while growing up to such an extreme that their definition of self becomes bound in these expressions and identities which were actually used by society to distinguish them and encourage them to conform in the first place. While INFPs may show the most identity expression, their expression of these identities necessarily falls within the context given to them and thus is simply only seemingly "nonconformist" because it stands in contradistinction to how we are told to be. To me the true question of non conforming has to come through the question of whose reality is least tied to the conditions laid out to them and who has differentiated themselves not the most as a causa efficiens, but whose causa finalis is most in line with their own noumena. It is the victory of the subconscious over the conscious in terms of definitions of self and definitions of action that truly allows a person to come out of conformity and live in a reality which is theirs consciously and only one type is capable of this level of liberation. INTJ by a landslide.F is more conformist as they are more likely to avoid uncomfortable feelings that come with going against the grain, although INFPs are probably biggest on artistic non-conformism because it allows them to be true to themselves in a safer place. INTP are the least conformist though pretty easily.INFP. But sometimes they're so hell bent on anti-conformism that they can adopt some pretty messed up ideological views and not even realize it because they've naively convinced themselves it's the right thing to do.5w4 Sx/Sp - I preferred rather end the relationship than adjust to my girlfriend.anti conformism is fi so infp and isfpAccording to this study, it is ENTP, followed by ESTP, then INTP. (Secondary sociopathy aspect) http://worldofanentp.tumblr.com/post/96219034302/psychopathic-typesSome sort of IxxP. Probably ISFP. ISFPs tend to be everywhere but I can't think of a community where there would be a cluster of ISFPs. You'll find plenty of INTPs in academia or the debate team. ISTPs as martial artists or soldiers. INFPs in some sort of creative endeavor like music, writing, etc. ISFPs seem to have a bunch of different enneagram types and can be extremely different from one another. 2s, 3s, 4s, 6s, 7s and 9s.My INFP friend is never happy with anything. It must be a curse to be INFP.INFPs are inherently individuals. They don't like to be confined. It only stifles their creative spirit. And when they let that creative spirit loose, they get all happy and their eyes sparkle and it's kind of adorable.Something Ti-dom. INTJ conforms out of practicality while INFP conforms to avoid conflict.Fi dominating type will defend the individuality. The auxiliary Ne function seeing new possibilities will give INFP an advantage over the ISFP Se function that it will be connected to the here and now sensing. Thus, INFP.I've thinking about that and definitely, we were not talking about the same.Hm. Maybe I got a wrong concept. I was talking about conform with a bad option within a set of strong options.But what does that have to do with conformity?INTJs are much more potential seekers and ambitious, up to get what they visualize on mind which is normally the best option and its almost full potential. A Ne user at least would've considered even the worst posibilities and said 'Well, it could have been worse'.

Bullshit for INFP. INFP's are more likely peacemakers, so they are more likely to conform.

You mistyped INFP for IXFJ peacemaking is Fe not Fi

No.

Jesus dude there's more to the types than the fucking functions

I think its like INFP -> deny, ENTP/INTJ (and sometimes ENFP) -> defy (meaning more active), and INTP somewhere in the middle.

There are fi & fe types with a 9 enneagram so you're wrong.

Least to most conformist in order: ENTP, INTP, INFP, INTJ, INFJ, ENTJ, ISTP, ESTP, ISFP, ESFP, ISFJ, ISTJ, ENFP, ENFJ, ESTJ, ESFJ

Why would 5w4 be less conformist than 4w5?

A feeler might be peer pressured into something more than a thinker maybe?

I know a lot of INFP that are non-conformists but in an avoidant sort of way, avoiding conflict and all about their oddities but showing them whenever they can.

Any vote for something other than NTP is wrong. ENTPs (7w8/8w7 can represent the same concept) may be more externally-non-conformist, while INTPs are more non-conformist in thought.

IxxP because of dominant Ji, auxillary Pe and a lack of Je. Etxtraverts conform more as well. I don't see how S has to do with conforming and N with not. It's a different way of taking in information, that's it. Ji would be judging it differently and acting differently.

Why ENFP would be most conformist than a ISFJ this is fucking no sense conformism is Fe by definition wherheas Fi is more about authenticity and being unique.you should seriously making argument for this order wich seem very bad . Fi and T

Fi and ti is very subjectivist so more anti conformist

INTJ is the #1 type to surround themselves with people that are exactly like themselves so no

There's sheep and free-thinkers of every type and intuitives are probably more likely to be part of a cult. You're not super non-conforming just cause you're an intuitive and you think your parents are morons. Most of you conform to the values of your generation anyways so you're really not as individualist as you think. Who here has actual opinions that are controversial? How many of you are racist, sexist, homophobic, etc? Yeah, that's what I thought.

:clap:

Glad you agree

Wrong, not conforming only means that you don't only have certain opinions to conform, but formed your opinions by yourself. You don't have to be different or controversial to not be a conformist, you just don't do certain things to fit in, but do whatever you think you should do. Not all people who have the same opinion as the majority of other people are conformists. Your "controversiality" argument is therefore invalid.

INTJ because of Ni and Fi. INTP's perceive the world around them through a filter that picks up patterns from only the world they exist within (Ne) and express their ideas in a way that is infinite but restrictive. Ne users, while exceptionally creative, only explore ideas that can be explored on a mundane basis. If an Ne user shares a piece of art, it resonates most among other Ne users and sensors (a sensing function in the dominant or auxiliary position.) You will notice people understand it immediately, it "clicks" in their mind because the ideas remain within the realm of the real world. Ni art on the contrary is original. These are ideas that are not directly relatable to the world and often go misunderstood. They are often lost in translation. INTP's also have inferior Fe, which binds them to a way of looking at the world framed to appease others and receive positive feedback. It is greatly weakened in the inferior position but the dependency exists. INFP's having Fi in the dominant position do not have to deal with this problem. But Ne in the auxiliary position forces INFP's to be influenced by their world enough to internalize a form of conformity (ha!) INTJ's do not experience this. They have a naturalized absence of abidance to people (Fi) led by a guidance preset in the otherworldly, what exists in their head (Ni). They are truly removed from the idea of conformity. It is not something they consider or process unless brought to their attention by an external force of nature, stopping the inherent flow of thought and free expression that works in their minds.

Since this is more based on size of each other egos wanting to flash our wangs of honor of being the least conformist. Dominant and Inferior function should be focus more. Ti/Fi-dom and Fe/Te-inf will have problem dealing with the benefit of conform aka group thinking when comes to concern of what makes sense and what is consider ideal conformity. Si/Ni-dom and Ne/Se-inf will be the most neutral about conformity. As they see it has its place in it but could care less. They may support conformity group think but will not benefit from it. Se/Ne-dom and Ni/Si-inf will seem to be supportive of conformity, but for more of their own pleasure rather the benefit of others. Therefore they are neutral. They will mostly don't support conformity but will benefit from it. Te/Fe-dom and Fi/Ti-inf will be the most supportive of conformity and usage of it for others. IxxJ and ExxP are neutral conformist. ExxP benefit from conformity. IxxJ don't benefit from it. ExxJ are the most supportive of conformist. IxxP are the most reluctance about conformity.

No, this is not how Ne works and I'm tired of people saying it's limited to the real world, that's nonsense. Extraverted intuition isn't even really extraverted, you just have a sea of ideas to pick from and pick one good out after another if you're making f.i. art.

Conformity is EJ not EP

Plus Ne doesn't filter, that's actually the opposite of what it does.

Why are EPs supposed to benifit from conformity though?

Doesn't seem to make sense to me

Once again, Orb, I see you're trying to turn typology into a hierarchy rather than a classification...

Because ExxP tertiary function are Fe/Te. Meaning they enjoy social conformity but aren't really conformist supporter(Fi/Ti auxiliary) . IxxJ auxiliary function are Te/Fe. Meaning they may support conformity, but don't enjoy social conformity tertiary Fi/Ti. Auxiliary function is what we tend help others. Tertiary function is what we tend to find comfort from others.

Oh, right, function stacks x)

Hey, @orbweaver, how would you type this person based on their creative process : http://mbtibase.com/viewchar/Type-this-person-Type-this-mbti-personality-type---38283 Curious about it.

For example Kawaii you are assuming INFP. Therefore your tertiary is Si. Meaning your comfort will not be from others but from your very own experience. Whether that be art, music, cartoon, reading anything that you remember to you. Auxiliary Ne means you want to show other patterns you see in your surrounding. That is all. ISTJ for example wants to show how structure the surrounding to other(Te). It finds it comforts in reading philosophy and the philosopher, motivating books and etc(Fi). ESFP for example wants to show others to be yourself(Fi aux). Wants to join organization group(Te) to achieve something. ESTP ror example wants to show others to think logically framework(Ti). And enjoys surrounding itself with people(Fe tert). That is basically it.

Whatever man

Filter is used here in a loose sense. Through what method of perception do we judge? Reality is what it is and our perceiving functions are each ways of taking in new information, or filters. Ne is bounded to what has been experienced and "recycles" for the lack of a better term ideas that already exist.

Hey feel free to be whoever you want. But that is what I've been reading up to now so far. I don't take it too personally. But it is what it says. I've been reading a bit of Bebe model of archetype lately. Dominant is you leading your life. Auxiliary is who you show to others. Tertiary is what you feel most comfortable about yourself with. Inferior is something you always feel lacking. The shadow function is basically you when you feel confronted. Opposing is you appearing strong and defensive. Critical is you getting annoyed with others. Deceptive is you trying to be mischievous and pointing other as hypocrite. Demon is when all hell breaks loose you just want them out of your life. That is basically it. If I was INFP stress. I start by being defensive by pointing out everyone pretends to be nice but ar not. I become bickering when the inevitable is truth, and try to refuse and show other multiple alternate patterns. Even if its meaningless. I start address everyone is being hypocrite they way the talk, act, dress and etc. And finally I want to destroy my opponent logic by yelling them its illogical it makes no sense.

Then what even is its purpose? The way you're describing Ne it's objectively inferior to Ni.

xNxP types