Sign Up | Log in |

Type with the worst Te

MBTI enneagram type of Type with the worst Te Realm:

Psychology, Philosophy, Writing and Social Sciences

Part of:
MBTI Best and worst


INFP - 15 vote(s)
ISFJ - 6 vote(s)
ISFP - 5 vote(s)
INFJ - 2 vote(s)
INTP - 1 vote(s)

Log in to vote!


9W1 - 10 vote(s)
4W5 - 3 vote(s)

Log in to vote!

Log in to add a comment.


Sort (descending) by: Date posted | Most voted
  • Posted on: 2017-11-15 02:00:40


    Empiricism is great but terrible when answering the questions like "Why are born again Christians so messed up?"

    Plus it never helps to filter out the bullshit urban dictionary jargon. Every community has their own urban dictionary jargon. In fact, good non fiction books always have a glossary and an index.

    • Posted on: 2017-11-15 02:02:00


      Plus to think for yourself is more Ti than Te. Schools don't teach you to think for yourself, making Te the dominant focus. Thats why xSTPs are more likely to drop out of high school because of Ti.

  • Posted on: 2017-11-14 18:42:03


    INFJ like plato often have problem with empiricism (Te) or any pragmatism. so i voted INFJ.
    ISFJ are Si user . Te and Si share many characteristics (careful, value experience, want proof etc...) so not ISFJ.
    INFP have Te as an inferior so he exist but come only to support their Fi. try to being productive and act for what your believe is fair and authentic.

    • Posted on: 2017-11-14 19:19:03

      strawberry crisis

      Fg have you ever heard of the mbti manual

    • Posted on: 2017-11-14 19:23:40


      Is it a letter bullshit book?

    • Posted on: 2017-11-14 19:30:01

      strawberry crisis

      Heyyy isabel authored it herself you know!!!

    • Posted on: 2017-11-14 20:31:09


      >INFJ like Plato often have problem with empiricism (Te)

      xxTJs like fg seem to hate empiricism too. What gives?

    • Posted on: 2017-11-14 22:27:50


      Don't hate empiricism . seem you try to make authority argument once again scotty

    • Posted on: 2017-11-14 22:33:28


      The problem with MBTI is we don't agreed with the definition who have to be in relation with observation. i used the example of plato who is an INFJ to support my idea. did you do that? nope so shut your mouth once for all scotty

    • Posted on: 2017-11-14 22:42:35

      mike ike

      Destroy his ass fg

    • Posted on: 2017-11-14 22:45:48


      His head on a spike would be enough for me, his mouth is far more full of shit than his ass.

    • Posted on: 2017-11-14 22:48:20


      You go spastic on people who want to use a more empirically backed form of typology, while using something totally non-empirical yourself.

      I have no clue what Plato's type is but if you are using his aversion to empiricism to type him, then you should at least be consistent and look at how totally non-empirical you can be. All I see is someone who is anti-empirical.

      I believe myself, an INTP, to be way more of a believer in "empiricism" than you, an xxTJ. Maybe you should just stop typing people by syncretizing philosophy with functions.

      And I did use the example of fg who is an xxTJ to show that xxTJs like fg "often have problem with empiricism". At least this starts to look like a valid argument as long as we are accepting whatever you are doing.

    • Posted on: 2017-11-14 22:59:12


      HAHAH hey fg define Ti vs Te real quick now

    • Posted on: 2017-11-14 23:05:46


      More empirically backed typollogy are you kidding me?!

      E/I dichotomy is shitty because lot of people act extroverted at work introverted in family or vice versa

      N/S dichotomy is shitty because it can show why SJ are focused on the past and SP on the present. it's also shitty because you made imagination (N) from external observation of the physical world (S)

      T/F dichotomy is stupid because everyone have feeling and try to be rationnal

      P/J dichotomy because some people can be very organized on date/time etc... but are totally disorganized in the space.

      function are better because have more precise definition.

      Fi=authenticity + uncompromizing values
      Ti=value logical consistencies and adaptable
      Ni= have a clear vision of what future will be + metaphorical tendencies
      Se:in the moment and seek thrill + value aesthetic
      Ne:love possibility , brainstorming and switch out idea to another
      Fe:compromizing , people oriented and empathic
      Si:value experience and tradition, dislike change
      Te: need proof ,confrontationnal , pragmatic

      in seeing a person behavior you can see what is his type according or what are his value/interest.

      epicure said we have too agree about the definition (prolepsis) to answer with our sense(empirism) to question.

      here the best definition is clearly function.

    • Posted on: 2017-11-14 23:58:33


      Is that what is logically consistent to you and you’ve reached that insight independently, basing your knowledge on one or more theories made also independently from the core definitions of MBTI by its creators, such theories that only use MBTI terms as shortcuts (much like that rando down there used socionics terms for MBTI function theory, such adaptable and flexible thinking), completely disregarding previous data and research on MBTI by doing so, while also claiming it is the same thing, and the empirical proof for it you have is explaining how it makes sense to you subjectively? Btw when you talk abt the functions, talk abt what u think abt their order as well, since it has one according to the theory you follow, n explain that in detail too ^_^

    • Posted on: 2017-11-14 23:59:37


      Still waiting for the empirical backing, boss.

      I disagree that things should be binary as well, and dislike dichotomous thinking. I see people saying they are INxP or whatever all the time, with the "x" in it. This means that they aren't strongly on one side or the other. This is a lot more difficult with The Functions, where people say "either you are Ne-Si or Se-Ni" or something like that.

      Functions don't have precise definitions. Or maybe it'd be better to say they have multiple definitions, some of which may be precise. What you described there is not like how Jung would describe The Functions at all. So if you typed using Jung's functions, you could end up with a totally different type. For example, I'd end up with a function order of something like Ti-Fi-Ni-Te-Ne in the descriptions you used. But if you defined them slightly different, the order would be altered.

    • Posted on: 2017-11-15 00:13:40


      And yes MBTI test results can be empirically tied to other things, something that you could attempt with The Functions but people can't even agree on how to test them.

    • Posted on: 2017-11-15 00:21:48

      strawberry crisis

      Fg, can you test for The Functions?

    • Posted on: 2017-11-15 06:08:15


      "Still waiting for the empirical backing, boss."did you even read the last part on epicure?.

      function may have multiple definition but precise one whereas letter have shitty dichotomies like i explained before.

      so at least in function we can say "with jung's cognitive function we can say a person is x type" .

      Se-Ni and Ne-Si are related . you have to act on the present (Se) to influence a higher future. you have to acumulate data with experience (Si) to create new thing. as well for Te-Fi ans Ti-Fe.
      Fi use Te for make value hierarchy and Te use Fi because even if they make the pragmaic decision they want to do that for the "greater good"ideal.Ti need Fe openness to adapt himself to new way of thinking and Fe need Ti to understand people pain to help them emotionally.
      but we can say someone is ISJ when he have tendencies to sometimes repressed the possibilities because he care so much about previous experience he want to keep it inchanged.
      or we could say he is ENXP if he have tendencies to sometimes being so enthusiastic about new knowledge he let down previous knowledge who can make himself understand the new things.

      so that's why you can not be Ti>Ni>Fi>Ne deary because function are correlated .

    • Posted on: 2017-11-15 06:12:49


      I am a counter example to your "correlations" which are a lie. One day you will learn to use letter not function.

      And you are ignoring the much shittier dichotomies of Se-Ni-ishness-Ne-Si-ishness and Te-Fi-ishness-Ti-Fe-ishness.

      I don't know about epicure, is it like an epic manicure?

  • Posted on: 2017-11-14 14:43:56


    J types usually have a lot of Te because J and Te share a lot of traits

  • Posted on: 2017-11-14 14:41:55

    mike ike

    INFP works, i can get behind that

  • Posted on: 2017-11-14 08:50:14


    @Scotty lol I think people forget ISFJ are an SJ type first for some reason.

    • Posted on: 2017-11-14 14:44:03

      mike ike

      Yeah, i never understood why ISFJ was always voted on entries like this. judging is worlds closer to "Te" than perceiving and sensing is closer to the newer definition of Te

  • Posted on: 2017-11-14 08:40:58


    IxFP and xEI in Socionics. Due to the occasional Te/Se overlap in descriptions and thus a correlation, INFP would be the weakest because they are N/Ne. You aren't seriously going to tell me that ISFJ are going to be worst at a function associated with organizing, are you?

    • Posted on: 2017-11-14 08:42:10


      However if you use Jung's definition of the Extraverted Thinking type, then ISFP will be worst because his Te is very N.

  • Posted on: 2017-11-13 18:49:34


    Literally no. infjs and isfjs have polr Te which is far worse than inferior Te

    • Posted on: 2017-11-14 08:48:08


      MBTI is LITERALLY not Socionics. Nice try!

    • Posted on: 2017-11-14 08:55:53


      U tried applying socionics concepts to MBTI function theory HAHAH genuinely curious, where the hell did u read that that’s how it is? or did u just come up w this on ur own

    • Posted on: 2017-11-14 12:36:24


      You can literally just google that shit up

    • Posted on: 2017-11-14 14:02:19


      You can literally just learn where the concept of PoLR comes from by "googling that shit up" and that it isn't an MBTI thing, but rather a Socionics thing. As you can see I specifically responded "xEI in Socionics" because in Socionics the PoLR argument is almost incontrovertible.

      I don't care if some random nobodies decided to mix MBTI and Socionics into some retarded amorphous blob on Tumblr.

  • Posted on: 2017-11-13 17:58:43


    I'm already confused whats my type?

    • Posted on: 2017-11-13 17:59:36


      Thanks for these posts though

    • Posted on: 2017-11-13 18:17:43


      My Te's only 30% - 40% so that's in theory, not that low as 0%-10%